what do you prefer-Lunchbox or Pumpkin?

[markbt73]

I like the 'Box. I love the early-mid '50s Ford pickups, but I'm not crazy about it on a monster chassis. The Dodge Tradesman van can pull off the silliness of these vehicles better, and there are so many great van paint job ideas that you can always find something new to do with it.

But the Pumpkin shell doesn't rub the wheels as badly with the stock suspension... and the regular vertical body mounts are tougher. So, Lunchbox for all the possibilities the van body offers, and Pumpkin for carefree bashing. How's that?

[28yoKid]

Both have their own character! I think the Lunchbox looks better going over obstacles, but the MP looks better whizzing around...?!

[Origineelreclamebord]

Definetely the Lunchbox! I have neither of them, but I definetely know what I'd prefer to own. I never liked it that the rear cab had seperate wheel arches on the side (instead of a cab following the shape of the front half of the body) and a Monster Van - it just looks very funny and cool

[VinceVegaUK]

VLB better for rolling over and flipping

[bfst24]

lunchbox for me too

[TA-Mark]

To me they both look equally silly. Both look far better slammed on a M-04 chassis. There's much nicer bodies to fit to the comical chassis. TamTech Ferrari GTO would be about the right wheelbase... hahahaha

I've owned a few 1:1 vans and do have a soft spot for them though... Acoustics of the back of a van are sweet and your bed gets wet in the back of a truck

[HereBeMonsters]

Never liked the bulbous truck, 80s Van is way way way better...

[Jammer]

Real hard choice...both are cool. Dodge Van vs. Flareside truck...

I think the LB just wins due to the customising potential...most Pumpkins seem to be box art.